-
11 Nov 2011
This is the third and final part in an interview series on thought leadership. Marte Semb Aasmundsen, is a postgraduate student due to graduate this month with her MSc Strategic Public Relations and Communications Management at The University of Stirling in the UK. She approached me some time ago about interviewing me on the topic of thought leadership as part of her thesis.
This is part three of three excerpts from that interview:
What is your view on thought leadership’s role in influencing
a market?“You’re talking to somebody who’s obviously biased towards thought leadership. You know I would say that it’s one of the more powerful tools that you can use as a brand.
“I’m not saying it’s the be all and end all, there are other ways that people influence but there is no doubt in my mind having witnessed the power of thought leadership that it can create huge influence. It’s all about eminence and expertise and if you show eminence or excellence in the field, people see you as an expert, they want to come to you.
“If you just sell a service or a product, they can get that anywhere. Where’s the stickiness, where’s the trust associated with your brand?”
What’s your critique of thought leadership? How legitimate is
it?“You’re touching on a topic that I get quite passionate about – the loose use of the term thought leadership.
“There are a lot of businesses out there that use it incredibly loosely. Some businesses just like put out a piece of pop-research, you know the sort – a quick, cheap and nasty opinion poll. They call this thought leadership and its absolute bull!“Then you have other companies putting content out there, calling it thought leadership but it’s actually just their opinion. It’s not evidence based in any way.
“There will always be varying levels of what people think is thought leadership but some of it isn’t.
“I’m pretty pure in my definition or my approach to what thought leadership is. The key is having a process. The first step in that process is researching what the challenges and issues that your audience face – in their day to day lives – or in their business. Than matching it to where your expertise lies and how you can elevate those areas of expertise or conduct a deep dive through further research to enhance your understanding and knowledge in that particular field. Then you need a communications strategy, a content management plan and an activation plan so that the whole thing is tied together very neatly into a comprehensive thought leadership plan.
“This plan should incorporate the business objectives, the research, the content management strategy, the activation strategy, and then the measurement and evaluation at the end.
“I think that’s how practitioners have to look at it. You need a process and a methodology that takes the client on a journey that arrives at a thought leadership property that is well researched, has a good strategy behind it, is well thought through and importantly has the buy in of the business and not just the PR team.
“If it doesn’t have the buy in across sort of senior level it will never be effective.
Has thought leadership been used for short term promotional
gain?“Absolutely, it goes with what I said earlier, there are a lot of companies out there that use pop-research or pop-thought leadership as the quick and nasty, let’s get it out there approach.
“It may well be an interesting, quirky angle but typically it doesn’t have any depth and really doesn’t add any value to anybody. However, companies are putting that sort of stuff out all the time and all it’s for is a quick media hit.
Is the short-term approach detrimental to a thought
leadership strategy?“I think that’s a really interesting question and I think you’re right. I think it could. I have no evidence to support this, but off the top of my head I think it could actually do some damage. The reason I say this is because it puts you on the lower rung of the thought leadership ladder and people come to expect that from you.
“Once your audience associates your brand with that level of content, trying to elevate the perception of the market about your content/thought leadership material you deliver can be difficult.”
Feel free to download my e book at the top right of this page. I’d welcome you to follow me on twitter @thoughtstrategy and join me on LinkedIn.
-
8 Nov 2011
This is part two of an interview series on thought leadership. Marte Semb Aasmundsen, is a postgraduate student due to graduate this month with her MSc Strategic Public Relations and Communications Management at The University of Stirling in the UK. She approached me some time ago about interviewing me on the topic of thought leadership as part of her thesis.
This is part two of three excerpts from that interview:
Do you believe a brand can be a thought leader?
“I think there are enough examples to show that brands can be thought leaders. In fact, I have changed my opinion on this over the years. My view previously was that a thought leadership campaign needed individuals. And while you do need individuals to take that message forward, from experience I’ve witnessed how a brand can evolve a thought leadership strategy on its own. Examples would be Dove’s Campaign for Real Beauty; BMW’s Activate the Future, IBM’s Smarter Planet.”
What’s the way forward? How sustainable is thought leadership
and what are the risks?“A thought leadership campaign that rests on one individual is risky. What happens if that person leaves? If Richard Branson were to leave Virgin would that thought leadership go with him? There is always that danger.
“Companies are aware of this and they adjust accordingly.
“I think thought leadership is in its infancy. As companies rapidly catch on to the content game to engage with their consumers or clients they will also realise that they need to differentiate their content, come up with something new, something to challenge their audience and something that adds value to their challenges beyond just a good ‘for information’ read.”
Is thought leadership measurable?
“I believe measurement is the key to thought leadership – not only can it be measured, it has to be measured.
“The critical element that you need up front before you even start, is setting out the business objectives. What do you want to achieve for the business from your thought leadership campaign?
“If you don’t do that upfront, it will be very difficult to measure. Once you’ve established these, you need to attach key performance indicators to them with assigned responsibilities. You should be able to be very clear in your measurement criteria e.g. we want to meet the board or the CEOs of 20% of the top 100 listed companies in America or Australia or wherever you
are. Or, we need to publish four white papers a year and each should be distributed to our entire client base, etc.“So you become very specific about the criteria and how you measure them. You can become even become more specific e.g. if we want to meet 20 % of the top 100 companies over the next two years we want to have three as clients.
“Another key thing to do is to research the impact of your thought leadership on your stakeholders. You should be researching them to find out whether what you gave them was valuable and how it can be improved. If you’re in it for the long-term, you need to be measuring and evaluating so that you can tweak it and change it and make it relevant to your customers.”
What are the evaluation methods for a thought leadership
campaign?“I would say that most thought leadership probably isn’t measured. From my experience, companies that do measure normally use a mixture of qualitative and quantitative research but mainly qualitative.”
Does thought leadership have a financial impact?
“I think it can have a significant impact and I base that on what I’ve seen. I’ll give you an example, Deloitte in Australia identified six years ago that they wanted to get in front of the boards of the top 100 companies listed on the Australian stock exchange. It was identified as an area on which they wanted to work and they came up with a thought leadership proposition on risk – risk to boards, risk to board members, how they look after that risk, what that risk is, etc.
“Five to six years later they now have access to the top 100 boards. Their partners now have relationships with members on those boards, which they didn’t have before or to a limited degree.
“I am not privy to the numbers in terms of the monetary return but they wouldn’t be committed to it at such a senior level if it wasn’t working.”
In part three, Marte asks me about thought leadership and influence, my view on the legitimacy of thought leadership as a marketing tool and its use as a short-term campaign.
Feel free to download my e book at the top right of this page. I’d welcome you to follow me on twitter @thoughtstrategy and join me on LinkedIn.
-
4 Nov 2011
Marte Semb Aasmundsen, is a postgraduate student due to graduate this month with her MSc Strategic Public Relations and
Communications Management at The University of Stirling in the UK. She approached me some time ago about interviewing me on the topic of thought leadership as part of her thesis.I will run excerpts from that interview over three posts. This is the first:
How would you define thought leadership?
“As evolving content that is geared towards the issues and challenges of your target audiences or your business prospects.
It should enable you to have conversations with them and a relationship beyond selling your products or services. It’s got to be client centric and it’s got to address the issues and challenges that clients and your prospects care about, because if it doesn’t you’ll struggle to gain traction.“Ideally good thought leadership should be a bit of a game changer – it challenges conventions, it can be pretty out there, it’s new and not everybody agrees with it. In fact, if you can engage in dialogue with people who disagree, fantastic, because that just raises the profile of your thought leadership even further. Effectively, you want to be challenging the industry with your point of view as well as your stakeholders to think differently about that sector or that industry.”
What’s the underlying purpose of thought leadership?
“Quite simply to position yourself as the expert in that field, to position yourself as someone that has a different point of view and who can add value to your clients or your prospective clients. To position yourself as the go to person in your area.”
Why do organisations choose to implement a thought leadership
strategy?“More than ever companies are struggling to differentiate themselves. There is so much content out there and the competition is in the increase. It’s very difficult to stay at the top of the pile and companies have realised that the consumer, whether they are in B2C or B2B, are looking for something a little bit different, they want to be engaged with that business.
“And it shouldn’t be an engagement that says to them ‘these guys are just trying to sell me their products, or they’re just trying to sell me their services.’ Ultimately it should be the type of engagement that says to them ‘these guys really understand my sector, they really understand me, and they’ve given me stuff that has added value. I feel very comfortable talking to these guys because they really do understand my issues and challenges.’
“It becomes a lot easier to sell when you talking to somebody about their problems as opposed to your product.”
Is there a difference between B2B vs B2C thought leadership?
“Yes. B2B can be a lot more targeted. It also requires more depth in terms of the research in the sector within which you operate. I think B2C in some ways can by more difficult because the audience is a lot bigger and more diverse – depending of course on what you’re selling. As a result it is more difficult to define your thought leadership position and delivery of that is more challenging.
“When it comes to a business, for example if you are a lawyer or a management consultant, you have a very defined audience, you probably have a closer relationship with them and as a result I believe it’s easier to target your thought leadership in terms of their needs. “
In part two Marte asks me about whether a brand can be a thought leader, the sustainability of thought leadership, whether it’s measurable and how you measure it.
Feel free to download my e book at the top right of this page. I’d welcome you to follow me on twitter @thoughtstrategy
and join me on LinkedIn. -
26 Oct 2011
On his blog, B2B Digital Marketing, Eric Wittlake, moderated a Twitter #B2Bchat on Thought Leadership, why companies should invest in thought leadership and its meaning.
The question that fascinated me was defining thought leadership in 140 characters. Thanks to Eric I have published them here.
These add to the existing and growing list of definitions on this blog.
I suggest you check out the rest of Eric’s post on this as there are some interesting insights.
Eric is a digital and B2B marketer with a background in analytics and online media. He is based in Portland, Oregon and runs the media group at Babcock & Jenkins.
- How do you define thought leadership in 140 characters or less?
- Thought leaders are the trusted advisers of their clients, due to their established expertise in their particular domain #B2Bchat @B2Bento
- First and foremost, thought leadership is bestowed, not claimed. #b2bchat @jeffthesensei
- Thought leaders are often heretics. Prime example is Galileo. #b2bchat @jeffthesensei
- A thought leader is someone who is able to see things in a way no one else does #b2bchat @tracibrowne
- @GeraldMoczynski: At most simplistic, thought leadership is: If you speak, do others listen and, do they FOLLOW your lead? @swee06840
And here is my own attempt in 135 characters:
“Thought leadership is about sharing insights and content that meets a known or unmet demand, challenge or issue in your audiences’ lives.”
Please send in your definitions in 140 characters or less on the comments page.
Feel free to download my e book at the top right of this page. I’d welcome you to follow me on twitter @thoughtstrategy and join me on LinkedIn.
-
21 Oct 2011
Jack Lundee approached me a little while back about a guest blog. He is an avid blogger on Everything Left.
He describes his blog as a “blog to relay the latest Liberal-based current events and political news to its readers.”
In this post he has analysed what he believes it takes to be a leader - I believe that these echo the characteristics needed
to be a thought leader.In order to really understand what it takes to be a leader, one must really sit down and analyze the various characteristics of somebody who leads.
Classically, a leader can be defined as a person who is followed by others. I believe a leader must have the following
traits:Trustworthiness
Whether you’re Doug Band of the Clinton Global Initiative or a regular door-to-door salesman, you must always be honest. Honesty, integrity and trustworthiness are significant qualities of a leader simply because without them, nobody would
consider addressing that person as somebody who they’d follow. In other words, you can’t build character by lying, cheating and stealing – Dishonesty simply does not make an impression on anybody.Respectfulness
And you’re character is of course dependent on how you perceive and treat others, as well as your self. If you have an angry or self-defeating attitude, you’re likely to behave that way. This eventually leads to a loss of respect.
Perseverance
A leader must always be ready to fail.
Having the strength and courage to carry on through these mistrials is greatly consistent of a powerful leader. Again, you don’t have to be a world leader to preserver and overcome. Leaders can and usually will find the strength to pursue their visions, goals and good will towards others, even if they’ve experience some sort of adversity that normally would hold somebody back.
Benevolence
Most leadership theorists tend to leave this trait out, but I find it of great value to somebody entertaining a leadership position. The Dalai Lama once stated, “If you want others to be happy, practice compassion. If you want to be happy, practice compassion.” With kindness also comes compassion. And if you’re passionate about something, you’re probably one of the best kinds of leaders who do by example.
Ability to Lead by Example
Leaders always lead by example. I have yet to come across somebody who I consider a leader that didn’t lead by example. A
great illustration of this would be Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. Gandhi was not only the leader of an enormous peace
movement, but he also played a role as an activist. Let’s keep in mind that this commitment to “action,” had nothing to do with violence or upheaval. Gandhi simply led by using things like fasting as political protest. This gathered him thousands upon thousands of followers.Ability to Inspire and Influence
In accordance, Gandhi was able to influence and inspire. In fact, Martin Luther King actually pulled writings and referenced Gandhi in developing his own theories on non-violence. If somebody who you consider a “leader” has yet to inspire you or make you want to reach higher, perhaps it’s time to start idolizing someone else.
Intelligence
Last but not least, a good leader must be smart. Most of the time, if you’re smart, you’ll be in good shape. Even if you’ve done some deceitful things and hurt people in the past, with intelligence comes the realization that “It’s time to make a change, and stick with that change.” Intelligence can go a long way in terms of impacting yourself and others.
It certainly will attract followers, but without possessing some of these other traits, it’s useless in itself. You can be the smartest person in the world, and lead a life of consolatory confinement if you’re unable to maintain positive relationships with others, and these relationships are earned through honesty, respect, influence, kindness, courage, and determination.
By: Jack Lundee of Shades of Green and Everything Left.
-
26 Sep 2011

Insights from 7 thought leaders
Over the course of the last few years I have had the privilege of interviewing a number of thought leaders in different fields. I’ve taken the best of what these seven thought leaders have shared on the topic and hopefully you’ll find them useful.
David Meerman Scott, author of “The new rules of PR and Marketing”, is well known to many marketing and public relations professionals. When he was working for NewsEdge he famously ignored the advice of his PR and ad agency and ‘broke the old rules’ by publishing lots of free content online which resulted in hundreds of sales.
Sales and thought leadership
David explained the link between thought leadership and sales this way.
“The Web gives everyone—B2B companies, consumer brands, consultants, non-profits, and even rock bands, churches, and colleges—a tremendous opportunity to reach people and engage them in new and different ways.
“When you build content especially for your audience, you build a relationship with people before you’ve even met them. When it’s obvious that you understand your buyers and their problems, it jars your visitors into paying attention.
“You transform your marketing from mere product-specific, ego-centric gobbledygook that only you understand and care about into valuable information people are eager to consume and that they use to make the choice to do business with your organization. Instead of creating jargon-filled, hype-based advertising, you can create the kind of online content that your buyers naturally gravitate to—if you take the time to listen to them discuss the problems that you can help them solve.
“Then you’ll be able to use their words, not your own. You’ll speak in the language of your buyer, not the language of your founder, CEO, product manager, or PR agency staffer. You’ll help your marketing get real.”
Content and thought leadership
When I pressed David about his thoughts on producing content and whether content alone makes you a thought leader, his view was:
“The problem is that most organizations create content about their stupid products. What people need to realize is that nobody cares about your products (except you). What people do care about are themselves and ways to solve their problems.”
Another thought leader who had some interesting views on content is well known marketer Dana VandenHeuvel (Marketing Savant), who had this to say about content:
“Content is the medium of exchange for thought leaders. Now, there are nuances to this that I won’t go into, but on the surface, the more content you have, the more currency you have in your marketplace. If it’s you, with a content rich site sharing information that’s deemed useful by your audient (usefulness is key here), vs. a competitor with less content and fewer shared ideas and concepts, I’ve found the prospects like the person or organization that’s given them more currency and gives them a larger base perspective from which to make a decision.”
I love the way Dana equates content to currency and how it gives you the perspective to make decisions. My view is that for your thought leadership to truly work it has to give your clients the information and insights necessary to make informed decisions.
Gary Bertwistle, multiple author of books such as “Who stole my Mojo”, “What made you think of that”, “My Dad’s got Mojo” and “The Vibe” had this to say about content and taking your content to market:
“My advice to aspiring thought leaders would be to develop your own content. Too many so-called thought leaders are just parroting what they’ve read or heard, whereas a true thought leader espouses. To be a true thought leader you have to have original thoughts and this only comes from taking the time to be silent and to look, see, listen and really hear what’s going on around you to be able to form an opinion that can truly help take people and organisations forward. Thought leaders aren’t those who just repackage what everyone else has said. They must have an angle and a new approach, idea, concept or innovation that can truly lead.
“In today’s world books are not the only tool that business or leaders can use. Many thought leaders are using social media particularly well through blogs, tweets, podcasts and vidcasts. The book is purely the tool to help you get the word out.
“Organisations and business leaders can do just as good a job by truly investing in original thinking and using all the tools outlined above as the methods to share your thoughts as a leader. Blogs, tweets, Facebook, LinkedIn, DIGG, podcasts, vidcasts are all fine but if you’re not sharing innovative thinking that helps me as the follower to think differently or be better at whatever it is that I do, then you fail to add value and all those things are a waste of space. Too many companies are loading up with podcasts and blogs, which have no value and are a waste of time.”
Fiona Czerniawska is a global authority on thought leadership, particularly in the management consultancy space. There are few people who understand as much about thought leadership as Fiona. A co-founder of Source, a company specialising in researching the consulting industry, she has authored numerous management reports, books and papers.
She makes the following point about good content:
“If you look back at the block-buster management ideas of the past, they were all based on serious research, not a sudden brainwave or luck. I don’t believe in eureka moments except those that emerge from deeper-than-deep content. That being said, I do think that innovation in thought leadership will come from the way this content is assembled and disseminated.”
Thought leadership is about sharing
Generosity played a big part in Gary Bertwistles’s advice about content sharing:
“Today’s brands need to be generous.
“Generosity is a key driver for any thought leader or organisation wanting to lead. You can’t just sell a service or a product. You have to go above and beyond that and provide the extras.
“Provide the overs. The overs come in the form of information, advanced notice, freebies, alliances, promotion or insights. If you aren’t sharing your knowledge or insights with your target audience then you run the risk of leaving yourself open to attack from a competitor who does. Today it’s an expectation from your target audience. The buyer of any product or service expects the extras.”
Gary had a simple three-step process around thought leadership which comprised:
1. Clarifying who you are targeting
2. Clarify the category you want to occupy – find a single concept which differentiates you and decide what perceptions you want to create around this
3. Work out how you will infiltrate your target’s world in order to alert them about this information.
Bernard Salt is a global thought leader on consumer and demographic trends. He represents KPMG at conferences around the world sharing his insights on these topics.
When it comes to sharing information, Bernard is emphatic:
“There are a lot of people who I am aware copy my material, style and approach without attribution – there is no protection against intellectual theft. But the way I figure it is that it’s my job to remain intellectually creative to such a degree that pretenders are continually left with the option but to copy.
“The only people who are paranoid about giving away material are people who do not have faith that they are creatively superior to those who would copy them. Copy away. I’ll just think up other stuff. It keeps me sharp.”
Thought leadership is not about controlling the message
One of the areas where companies really battle in the social world is about controlling information. The idea of engaging in conversations online let alone having dialogues with people as a result of their thought leadership content is an anathema for most big corporations. Most companies have always pushed a message, typically a highly sanitised one at that, and then controlled it to the nth degree across all channels. As a result they really battle with the concept of no longer being in control of what is said about their brand and are hesitant about entering the social media world.
David Meerman Scott has a strong view on this and access to information:
“And you must resist the urge to “control the message.” Create something interesting that will be talked about online.
“When you lose control of your marketing by opening up and not requiring a registration, as many as fifty times the number of people will download it compared to the form requirement.”
Thought leadership is Customer focused
David believes one has to be customer focused when it comes to creating thought leadership content:
“My most important aspect of creating information is to throw away your own ego and instead create content for what I call ‘buyer personas’.
“I think ‘buyer personas’ are the king of marketing and a focus on buyer personas allows you to create the content.”
I couldn’t agree more, too many companies focus on what they’re excited about rather than taking time to find out the pressing issues and challenges facing their clients or prospects.
As Fiona Czerniawska point out:
“Clients have mixed reactions, depending on the subject-matter and their position. Overall, clients dismiss most thought leadership simply because it’s not relevant to them. There’s a lesson in this about ensuring all material is focused on as tight a group of clients as possible, otherwise – a bit like infections treated with antibiotics – they become resistant!
“Where it is relevant, views are much more positive: indeed, it’s quite clear that producing good thought leadership is, in many senior managers’ eye, a fundamental characteristic of a certain type of established, high-class consulting.”
Tips from a master thought leader
Most people will know Ken Blanchard from his book “The one minute manager” which has sold more than 13 million copies. The fact is Ken has published and co-authored over 50 books and is one of the top 25 top selling authors of all time on Amazon.
When I asked him about what tips he could give to other aspiring thought leaders he said:
“The first thing you have to do is to determine your leadership point of view—your thoughts about leading and motivating people. Your leadership point of view relates to who you are as an individual. It grows out of who influenced you, what your purpose is, what your values are, and what people can expect from you. This is important because research has shown that the most effective leaders have a clear leadership point of view and they’re willing to share it with others.”
Ken also makes a hard hitting point about sharing information and getting your thought leadership to market:
“The bottom line, though, is that you have to get the word out somehow. You can have the greatest, most innovative thoughts in the world, but if nobody hears about them, they’re worth squat.”
Thought leadership takes time
Bernard Salt believes that thought leadership is a test of endurance, personal belief and courage because it takes years to be recognised and to cut through the clutter. As he says: “You have to be the last person standing when all other pretenders have melted away.”
He also says that corporations need to be patient with thought leaders but that they are notoriously impatient.
Thought leaders need to be skilled communicators
Bernard is a firm believer that thought leaders need to be able to pitch their ideas – in other words they need to be skilled presenters and outstanding communicators. Bernard says:
“What business wants is a compelling case pitched verbally with passion and with direction. Hone your speaking and presentation skills. And then hone again.
“Watch good speakers and presenters. Watch stand-up comedians, they are brilliant at controlling an audience.
“Get to the point, speak passionately, use words well (you must be articulate), and connect with your audience. And when you think you are good enough in that skill area go out and learn some more because you are never good enough at speaking, pitching and presenting.”
Another global thought leader who believes in the power of presentation and effective communications is Howard Gardner, professor of Cognition and Education at the Harvard Graduate School of Education. Howard has authored 25 books and is best known for his theory on multiple intelligences: Howard had this to say about becoming a thought leader in your chosen field:
You need the “capacity to speak and write for a popular audience, and the willingness to go on television, travel, speak to general audiences…
“Every year I think that I improve both my understanding and my ability to communicate effectively – or at least I hope so.”
Key challenges for thought leaders
Fiona Czerniawska says that one of the trends she has identified is the way in which people are publishing their material with a plethora of new formats, including Twitter, videos, podcasts and design-your-own graphs.
She flags that the key challenge for thought leaders these days is:
“…you have less space to say things and I think consulting firms are struggling with the transition from back-breaking flagship reports to a pithier, more opinionated style. A five-minute video shouldn’t be a balding man in a grey suit reading the executive summary, but someone saying something memorable and thought-provoking, as well as fast. This type of thought leadership should be like the tip of an iceberg, with the underlying research below the waterline, but it often becomes an excuse for not doing the research in the first place – and that shows.”
How thought leaders attract attention
One of the areas that Fiona touched on was how thought leaders can attract a client’s attention. She has identified four areas on which a thought leader should focus. These are: appeal, differentiation, practical application and quality of thinking. She explains:
“These four factors relate to the quality of a firm’s output and that’s independent of quality (although, almost inevitably, a firm that decides to increase the quantity of its material takes a hit on quality). It’s tempting to say that quantity should never matter but it does: if you produce one piece of thought leadership on, say, strategy in the banking sector, but your competitor produces 20, then there’s a fair chance that you’ll get shouted down, however great your piece is.
“Quantity also sends a not-so-subliminal message to clients about how much a firm specialises in a particular area.
“However, I think firms could indeed be more creative about the way they package their content. In particular, I’d like to seem more “bundling” (putting related articles, in a mix of different formats, together in the same place); better recommendations (suggesting articles I might find of interest); and, please, please, please, better search engines. It’s incredibly frustrating to put a keyword in but not be able to sort the results by date or filter them.”
The future of thought leadership
Fiona believes that thought leadership has a bright future:
“I like to think that it will become a serious battleground for really good ideas. I may be laughed at for this on the quite reasonable grounds that (a) clients value small-scale insights more than grandiose conceptual models and (b) the extent to which thought leadership is – or can be – a crucible for innovation is questionable. But I do get frustrated by the lack of ambition in much thought leadership.
“There are some big and interesting questions about business that never seem to get debated – and it would be good to think that some of these will start to be discussed. The prerequisites to this, and I suspect to upping the overall quality of thought leadership, are investment and collaboration.
“I can’t believe we won’t see more money going into thought leadership in the future, as it’s clear that it is one of the few marketing activities which can differentiate a firm. And I also think consulting firms will realise that they have to work with people (clients and other consultants) outside the boundaries of their firms for inspiration.”
Please download my free e book top right of this page. Follow me on twitter @thoughtstrategy and join me on LinkedIn.
-
25 Aug 2011
Every year White Space ranks professional services firms in terms of their thought leadership presence. Fiona Czerniawska, who I interviewed for this blog earlier this year, is one of the global authorities on thought leadership, particularly in the management consultancy space.
White Space is a subscriber-based web service for anyone interested in thought leadership. They offer qualitative and quantitative evaluation of more than 18,000 pieces of thought leadership from about 25 leading consulting firms.
They rate consulting firms’ thought leadership twice a year, in July and in January/February.
Thought leadership ranking criteria
What I find interesting and what is a valuable lesson for any firm interested in thought leadership, are the criteria Fiona uses to rank thought leadership at these firms.
A single ranking criteria is way too narrow and limiting and as Fiona says: “It tends to mask the fact that firms tend to be good at different things.” So instead she has come up with four different quality criteria:
- Differentiation – the originality or distinctiveness of thought leadership conclusions
- Resilience – the depth of thinking and/or extent of evident research
- Appeal – the extent to which clients will perceive the material to be relevant to their specific circumstances
- Appropriate commercialisation – the likelihood the material will encourage the audience to take action.
Good thought leadership campaigns should…
When one dissects these criteria they reflect exactly what a good thought leadership campaign should comprise i.e.
- It should differentiate you from the competition
- It should show deep, empirical research to back up your experience, interpretation and opinion
- It should absolutely be client centric – in fact you should have first researched the client’s issues and challenges now and into the future
- It should singularly aim to achieve something with your clients or prospects e.g. to get in front of the boards of the top 100 listed companies.
The thought leadership rankings
Fiona’s rankings show that the group of firms at the top end has not changed dramatically. Booz&company is just ahead of what Fiona has labelled “ a resurgent Boston Consulting Group” whose position went from 6 to 2.
The reason for their resurgence? White Space says that it is not only because of some of their excellent material but also because they managed to weed out or avoid poorer-quality material.
Another firm that moved up the rankings was Accenture which moved from eight to six.
Besides the names already mentioned, other names that cropped up across the four criteria included: McKinsey, IBM, Roland Berger, PwC, Right Management, Hay Group, E&Y and KPMG
White Space is a subscriber-based web service for anyone interested in thought leadership. They offer qualitative and quantitative evaluation of more than 18,000 pieces of thought leadership from about 25 leading consulting firms.
Please download my free e book top right of this page. Follow me on twitter @thoughtstrategy and join me on LinkedIn.
-
5 Aug 2011
Can someone who curates content be a thought leader?
I’ve always said no because to be a thought leader necessitates generating original, new content or insights that address a certain markets issues or challenges. By doing this you display your depth of expertise on a topic or a business sector.
After some good banter on one to two websites about this I have developed two observations on content curation and thought leadership.
Curated content plays a support role to thought leadership
The first is that curated content can play a very important role in supporting and informing a thought leadership content program. For example, curated content feeds are a great way to keep in touch with trends which can inform your thought leadership topics and in that sense help with the content calendar.
New ideas as a result of curated content could be thought leadership
The second is that if the person curating the content is able to, through that content, arrive at new ideas or insights which they then deliver to their audience this could be construed as thought leadership.
Regurgitating content doesn’t cut it
Simply regurgitating someone else’s content is not going to cut it. Repurposing content is not going to cut it and neither will re-packaging it. Content curation cannot be called thought leadership. Only when it leads the curator into a totally new hypothesis or insight can it start approaching thought leadership status and at that point it is no longer curated content but rather the curator’s interpretation off the back of the curated content.
I don’t want to take anything away from content curation. It is fantastic for a content/editorial calendar and it can be a great support to a thought leadership campaign. Content curation allows you to monitor trends in your space and help inform better what you are planning in real time.
Some great sites on content curation
If you are interested in reading more on content and content marketing/curation there are some great sites such as www.contentmarketinginstitute.com www.junta42.com http://optimalaccess.com/ and www.getcurata.com
Please download my free e book top right of this page. Follow me on twitter @thoughtstrategy and join me on LinkedIn.
-
18 Jul 2011

Content curation does not equate to thought leadership
Karan Bavandi and I have been tweeting about whether content curation equals thought leadership. He believes it does and I believe it doesn’t. In Karan’s post he uses the dictionary definition of thought leadership which, unfortunately, is severely limiting in terms of where thought leadership has now moved (you can check out a whole lot of definitions here in this blog). Karan goes on to argue that curation is about authoring context and he maintains that is thought leadership.Find me a thought leader through curation alone
My challenge to Karan is to find me one recognised thought leader who has attained their position as a result of curating content only.If he can do that I will be convinced that content curation does equate to thought leadership.Thought leadership = original, creative or innovative content
The very nature of the term ’thought leadership’ implies original, creative or innovative thought. The very nature of curating content means that you are not the original generator of that content and therefore cannot claim to be a thought leader off the back of it.But that’s not to say that content curation cannot benefit thought leaders and thought leadership campaigns. In fact it can be used as a key tactic to turbo-charge your thought leadership campaign. But it is not and should not be the sole driver of your thought leadership campaign.Content curation experts like Karan can help you use it as a very powerful tool for your content strategy. Done properly it can be a great magnet for reaching an audience. It’s just not thought leadership.Here are some good examples of great content sites: www.mint.com, www.hubspot.com and www.openforum.comPlease download my free e book top right of this page. Follow me on twitter @thoughtstrategy and join me on LinkedIn.










